Here M.Wolowski pretends to think that the opponents of property refer only to property in land, while they merely take it as a term of comparison; and, in showing with wonderful clearness the absurdity of the position in which he places them, he finds a way of drawing the attention of his hearers to another subject without being false to the truth which it is his office to contradict.
"Property," says M.Wolowski, "is that which distinguishes man from the animals." That may be; but are we to regard this as a compliment or a satire?
"Mahomet," says M.Wolowski, "decreed property." And so did Genghis Khan, and Tamerlane, and all the ravagers of nations.

What sort of legislators were they?
"Property has been in existence ever since the origin of the human race." Yes, and so has slavery, and despotism also; and likewise polygamy and idolatry.

But what does this antiquity show?
The members of the Council of the State--M.

Portalis at their head--did not raise, in their discussion of the Code, the question of the legitimacy of property.

"Their silence," says M.Wolowski, "is a precedent in favor of this right." I may regard this reply as personally addressed to me, since the observation belongs to me.