They all arise from a false theory of property.

In principle, property is inviolable, but it can and must be checked and disciplined." Such are the conclusions of the professor.
When one thus remains in the clouds, he need not fear to equivocate.
Nevertheless, I would like him to define these ABUSES of property, to show their cause, to explain this true theory from which no abuse is to spring; in short, to tell me how, without destroying property, it can be governed for the greatest good of all.

"Our civil code," says M.
Wolowski, in speaking of this subject, "leaves much to be desired." I think it leaves every thing undone.
Finally, M.Wolowski opposes, on the one hand, the concentration of capital, and the absorption which results therefrom; and, on the other, he objects to the extreme division of the land.

Now I think that I have demonstrated in my First Memoir, that large accumulation and minute division are the first two terms of an economical trinity,--a THESIS and an ANTITHESIS.

But, while M.Wolowski says nothing of the third term, the SYNTHESIS, and thus leaves the inference in suspense, I have shown that this third term is ASSOCIATION, which is the annihilation of property.
November 30 .-- LITERARY PROPERTY.