Is it necessary to remind this journal that it has no right to deride a dogmatic philosopher, because it is without a doctrine itself?
From its foundation, "Le National" has been a nursery of intriguers and renegades.

From time to time it takes care to warn its readers.

Instead of lamenting over all its defections, the democratic sheet would do better to lay the blame on itself, and confess the shallowness of its theories.

When will this organ of popular interests and the electoral reform cease to hire sceptics and spread doubt?
I will wager, without going further, that M.Leon Durocher, the critic of M.
Leroux, is an anonymous or pseudonymous editor of some bourgeois, or even aristocratic, journal.
The economists, questioned in their turn, propose to associate capital and labor.

You know, sir, what that means.