If he could not stretch out his hand, it must be because of some external hindrance; (for we suppose him alive, with such a power of moving the parts of his body that he hath now, which is not in itself impossible, if God so pleased to have it; or at least it is not impossible for God so to move him:) and then I ask,--whether that which hinders his hand from moving outwards be substance or accident, something or nothing?
And when they have resolved that, they will be able to resolve themselves,--what that is, which is or may be between two bodies at a distance, that is not body, and has no solidity.

In the mean time, the argument is at least as good, that, where nothing hinders, (as beyond the utmost bounds of all bodies,) a body put in motion may move on, as where there is nothing between, there two bodies must necessarily touch.

For pure space between is sufficient to take away the necessity of mutual contact; but bare space in the way is not sufficient to stop motion.

The truth is, these men must either own that they think body infinite, though they are loth to speak it out, or else affirm that space is not body.

For I would fain meet with that thinking man that can in his thoughts set any bounds to space, more than he can to duration; or by thinking hope to arrive at the end of either.