[The History of Rome (Volumes 1-5) by Theodor Mommsen]@TWC D-Link book
The History of Rome (Volumes 1-5)

INTRODUCTION of Hellenic Alphabets into Italy
14/22

Still the older form of the -- "id:r" -- "id:P" did not so early and so completely disappear there as the older form of the -- "id:l"; this alteration therefore beyond doubt is to be placed later .-- V.

The differentiating of the long and short -e and the long and short -o remained in the earlier times confined to the Greeks of Asia Minor and of the islands of the Aegean Sea.
All these technical improvements are of a like nature and from a historical point of view of like value, in so far as each of them arose at a definite time and at a definite place and thereafter took its own mode of diffusion and found its special development.
The excellent investigation of Kirchhoff (-Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen Alphabets-), which has thrown a clear light on the previously so obscure history of the Hellenic alphabet, and has also furnished essential data for the earliest relations between the Hellenes and Italians--establishing, in particular, incontrovertibly the previously uncertain home of the Etruscan alphabet--is affected by a certain one-sidedness in so far as it lays proportionally too great stress on a single one of these proposals.

If systems are here to be distinguished at all, we may not divide the alphabets into two classes according to the value of the -- "id:X" as -- "id:zeta" or as -- "id:chi", but we shall have to distinguish the alphabet of 23 from that of 25 or 26 letters, and perhaps further in this latter case to distinguish the Ionic of Asia Minor, from which the later common alphabet proceeded, from the common Greek of earlier times.

In dealing, however, with the different proposals for the modification of the alphabet the several districts followed an essentially eclectic course, so that one was received here and another there; and it is just in this respect that the history of the Greek alphabet is so instructive, because it shows how particular groups of the Greek lands exchanged improvements in handicraft and art, while others exhibited no such reciprocity.

As to Italy in particular we have already called attention to the remarkable contrast between the Achaean agricultural towns and the Chalcidic and Doric colonies of a more mercantile character (x.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books