I have a letter from the Advocate highly approving my views, so I suppose you will very soon hear from Mr.Gifford specifically on the subject.

It is a matter of immense consequence that something shall be set about, and that without delay....
The points on which I chiefly insisted with Mr.Gifford were that the Review should be independent both as to bookselling and ministerial influences--meaning that we were not to be advocates of party through thick and thin, but to maintain constitutional principles.

Moreover, I stated as essential that the literary part of the work should be as sedulously attended to as the political, because it is by means of that alone that the work can acquire any firm and extended reputation.
Moreover yet, I submitted that each contributor should draw money for his article, be his rank what it may.

This general rule has been of great use to the _Edinburgh Review_.

Of terms I said nothing, except that your views on the subject seemed to me highly liberal.