300, 302, 450, 452.
[321:4] iii.p.1690 b.
[322:1] Hilgenfeld, in his recent _Einleitung_, says expressly (p.

797) that 'the New Testament had already in the second century been translated into Latin.' This admission is not affected by the argument which follows, which goes to prove that the version used by Tertullian was not the 'Itala' properly so called.
[322:2] See Smith's Dictionary, iii.p.1630 b.
[322:3] _Introduction_, p.

274.
[322:4] See Routh, _Rel.

Sac._ i.pp.124 and 152.
[323:1] See Scrivener, _loc.

cit_.
[323:2] See _New Testament_, &c., i.p.