399 sqq.] [159:1] [It will be seen that the arguments above hardly touch those of Dr.Lightfoot in the _Contemporary Review_ for August and October: neither do Dr.Lightfoot's arguments seem very much to affect them.

The method of the one is chiefly external, that of the other almost entirely internal.

I can only for the present leave what I had written; but I do not for a moment suppose that the subject is fathomed even from the particular standpoint that I have taken.] [162:1] The lists given in _Supernatural Religion_ (ii.p.

2) seem to be correct so far as I am able to check them.

In the second edition of his work on the Origin of the Old Catholic Church, Ritschl modified his previous opinion so far as to admit that the indications were divided, sometimes on the one side, sometimes on the other (p.