451, n.

1).

There is a seasonable warning in Reuss (_Gesch.h.

S.N.T._ p.

254) that the Tuebingen critics here, as elsewhere, are apt to exaggerate the polemical aspect of the writing.
[162:2] It should be noticed that Hilgenfeld and Volkmar, though assigning the second place to the Homilies, both take the _terminus ad quem_ for this work no later than 180 A.D.