p.
100).

We have just the remarkable coincidence spoken of above.

It does not prove that Tertullian did not faithfully reproduce the text of Marcion to show, which is the real drift of the argument on the preceding page (_S.R._ ii.p.

99), that he had not the canonical Gospel before him; rather it removes the suspicion that he might have confused the text of Marcion's Gospel with the canonical.
[212:1] This table has been constructed from that of De Wette, _Einleitung_, pp.

123-132, compared with the works of Volkmar and Hilgenfeld.
[213:1]: _S.R._ ii.p.110, n.3.The statement is mistaken in regard to Volkmar and Hilgenfeld.