142 sq.
[217:2] This admission does not damage the credit of Tertullian and Epiphanius as witnesses; because what we want from them is a statement of the facts; the construction which they put upon the facts is a matter of no importance.
[217:3] The omission in 2 Cor.iv.13 must be due to Marcion (_Epiph._ 321 c.); so probably an insertion in 1 Cor.ix.

8.
[218:1] Tert._Adv.

Marc._ v.

16: 'Haec si Marcion de industria erasit,' &c.

V.14: 'Salio et hic amplissimum abruptum intercisae scripturae.' V.3: 'Ostenditur quid supra haeretica industria eraserit, mentionem scilicet Abrahae,' &c.