At the confession of Peter he takes his place again, and there is a close agreement in the order of the three narratives.

The incident of the miracle-worker is omitted by Matthew, and then comes the insertion of a mass of extraneous matter by Luke.

When he resumes the thread of the common narrative again all three are together.
The insertion of a single parable on the part of Matthew, and omissions on the part of Luke, are the only interruptions.

There is an approximate agreement of all three, we may say, for the rest of the narrative.

We observe throughout that, in by far the preponderating number of instances, where Matthew differs from the order of Mark, Luke and Mark agree, and where Luke differs from the order of Mark, Matthew and Mark agree.