Wordsworth and Coleridge were concerned with deep-seated qualities and temperamental differences.
Their critical work revolved round their conception of the fancy and the imagination, the one dealing with nature on the surface and decorating it with imagery, the other penetrating to its deeper significances.
Hazlitt and Lamb applied their analogous conception of wit as a lower quality than humour, in the same fashion.

Dr.Johnson looked on the other hand for correctness of form, for the subordination of the parts to the whole, for the self-restraint and good sense which common manners would demand in society, and wisdom in practical life.

His school cared more for large general outlines than for truth in detail.

They would not permit the idiosyncrasy of a personal or individual point of view: hence they were incapable of understanding lyricism, and they preferred those forms of writing which set themselves to express the ideas and feelings that most men may be supposed to have in common.

Dr.Johnson thought a bombastic and rhetorical passage in Congreve's _Mourning Bride_ better than the famous description of Dover cliff in _King Lear_.