[Human Nature In Politics by Graham Wallas]@TWC D-Link book
Human Nature In Politics

CHAPTER I
29/37

It is clear, also, that it is our emotional nature, and not the intellectual or muscular organs of talking, which is most easily fatigued.

Light chatter, even among strangers, in which neither party 'gives himself away,' is very much less fatiguing than an intimacy which makes some call upon the emotions.

An actor who accepts the second alternative of Diderot's paradox, and _feels_ his part, is much more likely to break down from overstrain, than one who only simulates feeling and keeps his own emotional life to himself.
It is in democratic politics, however, that privacy is most neglected, most difficult, and most necessary.

In America all observers are agreed as to the danger which results from looking on a politician as an abstract personification of the will of the people, to whom all citizens have an equal and inalienable right of access, and from whom every one ought to receive an equally warm and sincere welcome.

In England our comparatively aristocratic tradition as to the relation between a representative and his constituents has done something to preserve customs corresponding more closely to the actual nature of man.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books