Agriculture is, perhaps, of all the useful arts that which improves most slowly amongst democratic nations.

Frequently, indeed, it would seem to be stationary, because other arts are making rapid strides towards perfection.

On the other hand, almost all the tastes and habits which the equality of condition engenders naturally lead men to commercial and industrial occupations.
Suppose an active, enlightened, and free man, enjoying a competency, but full of desires: he is too poor to live in idleness; he is rich enough to feel himself protected from the immediate fear of want, and he thinks how he can better his condition.

This man has conceived a taste for physical gratifications, which thousands of his fellow-men indulge in around him; he has himself begun to enjoy these pleasures, and he is eager to increase his means of satisfying these tastes more completely.
But life is slipping away, time is urgent--to what is he to turn?
The cultivation of the ground promises an almost certain result to his exertions, but a slow one; men are not enriched by it without patience and toil.

Agriculture is therefore only suited to those who have already large, superfluous wealth, or to those whose penury bids them only seek a bare subsistence.