But, generally speaking, it may be affirmed that the aristocratic principle is not favorable to the growth of trade and manufactures.

Moneyed aristocracies are the only exception to the rule.

Amongst such aristocracies there are hardly any desires which do not require wealth to satisfy them; the love of riches becomes, so to speak, the high road of human passions, which is crossed by or connected with all lesser tracks.

The love of money and the thirst for that distinction which attaches to power, are then so closely intermixed in the same souls, that it becomes difficult to discover whether men grow covetous from ambition, or whether they are ambitious from covetousness.

This is the case in England, where men seek to get rich in order to arrive at distinction, and seek distinctions as a manifestation of their wealth.
The mind is then seized by both ends, and hurried into trade and manufactures, which are the shortest roads that lead to opulence.
This, however, strikes me as an exceptional and transitory circumstance.
When wealth is become the only symbol of aristocracy, it is very difficult for the wealthy to maintain sole possession of political power, to the exclusion of all other men.