Conspicuous wastefulness does not directly afford ground for variation and growth, but conformity to its requirements is a condition to the survival of such innovations as may be made on other grounds.

In whatever way usages and customs and methods of expenditure arise, they are all subject to the selective action of this norm of reputability; and the degree in which they conform to its requirements is a test of their fitness to survive in the competition with other similar usages and customs.

Other thing being equal, the more obviously wasteful usage or method stands the better chance of survival under this law.

The law of conspicuous waste does not account for the origin of variations, but only for the persistence of such forms as are fit to survive under its dominance.

It acts to conserve the fit, not to originate the acceptable.