The Moderate Liberals, men like Sybel, had always been opposed to universal suffrage; even the English statesmen were alarmed; it was two years before Disraeli made his leap in the dark, and here was the Prussian statesman making a far bolder leap in a country not yet accustomed to the natural working of representative institutions.

He did not gain the adhesion of the Liberals, and he lost the confidence of his old friends.

Napoleon alone expressed his pleasure that the institutions of the two countries should become so like one another.
There was, indeed, ample reason for distrust; universal suffrage meant not only Democracy,--it was the foundation on which Napoleon had built his Empire; he had shewn that the voice of the people might become the instrument of despotism.

All the old suspicions were aroused; people began to see fresh meaning in these constant visits to France; Napoleon had found an apt pupil not only in foreign but in internal matters.

It could mean nothing more than the institution of a democratic monarchy; this was Bonapartism; it seemed to be the achievement of that change which, years ago, Gerlach had foreboded.