Their pride was pleased when they found the ablest Parliamentary leaders, the most learned historians and keenest jurists desirous to assimilate the institutions of Prussia to those which existed in England.

It is just this which ought to make us pause.

What do we think of politicians who try to introduce among us the institutions and the faults of foreign countries?
"Why will not the King of Prussia be content with the position which the Queen of England holds, or the King of the Belgians,--then all his unpopularity would be gone ?" was a question asked at the time by an English writer.

We may ask, on the other hand, why should the King of Prussia sacrifice his power and prerogative?
The question is really as absurd as it would be to ask, why is not an English Parliament content with the power enjoyed by the Prussian Parliament?
It was a commonplace of the time, that the continued conflict shewed a want of statesmanship; so it did, if it is statesmanship always to court popularity and always to surrender one's cause when one believes it to be right, even at the risk of ruining one's country.

It must be remembered that through all these years the existence of Prussia was at stake.