It is in fact only one of a vast multitude of similar stories, not merely in the two languages just referred to, but in French, which were but to show that the time of the novel was not yet come, even when the time of this century was all but over.
It was quite over, and the first two decades of the next were all but over too, before the way was, to any important extent, further explored: but important assistance in the exploration was given at the beginning of the second of these decades.

The history of the question of the relations of the Addison-Steele periodical, and especially of the "Coverley Papers," to the novel is both instructive and amusing to those who have come to appreciate the humours of literary things.

It would probably have shocked the more orthodox admirers of the _Spectator_, during the eighteenth century, to have any such connection or relation so much as hinted.

But when people began to consider literature and literary history in a better arranged perspective, the fact that there _is_ such a connection or relation must have been soon perceived.

It has become comparatively a commonplace: and now the third stage--that in which people become uneasy and suspicious of the commonplace and obvious and try to turn it topsy-turvy--has begun.
It is of course undeniable that the "Coverley Papers," as they stand, are not a novel, even on the loosest conception and construction of the term.