I therefore moved the following resolutions: "1st, That the award of the Royal medals, made on the 16th of November, 1826, being contrary to the conditions under which they were offered, is invalid.
"2dly, That the sum of fifty guineas each be presented to J.Dalton, Esq.

and James Ivory, Esq.

from the funds of the Society; and that letters be written to each of those gentlemen, expressing the hope of the Council that this, the only method which is open to them of honourably fulfilling their pledges, will be received by those gentlemen as a mark of the high sense entertained by the Council of the importance and value of their discoveries, which require not the aid of medals to convey their reputation to posterity, as amongst the greatest which distinguished the age in which they lived." It may be curious to give the public a specimen of the reasoning employed in so select a body of philosophers as the Council of the Royal Society.

It was contended, on the one hand, that although the award was SOMEWHAT IRREGULAR, yet nothing was more easy than to set it right.

As the original rules for giving the medals were merely an order of the Council,--it would only be necessary to alter them, and then the award would agree perfectly with the laws.