[The Development of the European Nations, 1870-1914 (5th ed.) by John Holland Rose]@TWC D-Link bookThe Development of the European Nations, 1870-1914 (5th ed.) CHAPTER VIII 66/67
272.] Here, then, as at so many points of their history, the Turks lost their opportunity, and that, too, through the incapacity and corruption of their governing class.
The war of 1877 ended as so many of their wars had ended.
Thanks to the bravery of their rank and file and the mistakes of the invaders, they gained tactical successes at some points; but they failed to win the campaign owing to the inability of their Government to organise soundly on a great scale, and the intellectual mediocrity of their commanders in the sphere of strategy.
Mr.Layard, who succeeded Sir Henry Elliot at Constantinople early in 1878, had good reason for writing, "The utter rottenness of the present system has been fully revealed by the present war[156]." Whether Suleiman was guilty of perverse obstinacy, or, as has often been asserted, of taking bribes from the Russians, cannot be decided.
What is certain is that he was largely responsible for the final _debacle_. [Footnote 156: _Sir William White: Life and Correspondence_, p.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|