Anybody can now see that their metaphysic and psychology were imperfectly thought out.

The important thing is that their metaphysic and psychology were calculated, notwithstanding all their superficialities, to inspire an energetic social spirit, because they were pregnant with humanistic sentiment.

To represent the Encyclopaedia as the gospel of negation and denial is to omit four-fifths of its contents.

Men may certainly, if they please, describe it as merely negative work, for example, to denounce such institutions as examination and punishment by Torture (See _Question, Peine_), but if so, what gospel of affirmation can bring better blessings ?[159] If the metaphysic of these writers had been a thousandfold more superficial than it was, what mattered that, so long as they had vision for every one of the great social improvements on which the progress and even the very life of the nation depended?
It would be obviously unfair to say that reasoned interest in social improvement is incompatible with a spiritualistic doctrine, but we are justified in saying that energetic faith in possibilities of social progress has been first reached through the philosophy of sensation and experience.
In describing the encyclopaedic movement as being, among other things, the development of political interest under the presiding influence of a humanistic philosophy, we are using the name of politics in its widest sense.

The economic conditions of a country, and the administration of its laws, are far more vitally related to its well-being than the form of its government.