I believe that they ought to have every possible protection.

I believe that their families ought to be provided for in order to take the weapon of starvation out of the hands of the capitalists.

I'd give them as fair a field as it is in my power to provide, and anybody would think that they would be satisfied with simple fairness.

But, no, what they are trying to do is not to strike _for_ themselves, but to strike _at_ somebody else.

They are not satisfied with protection from starvation unless that protection involves the right to starve somebody else.