Plato may have been right in denying that there was any ultimate difference in the sexes of man other than that which exists in animals, because all other differences may be conceived to disappear in other states of society, or under different circumstances of life and training.
The first wave having been passed, we proceed to the second--community of wives and children.

'Is it possible?
Is it desirable ?' For as Glaucon intimates, and as we far more strongly insist, 'Great doubts may be entertained about both these points.' Any free discussion of the question is impossible, and mankind are perhaps right in not allowing the ultimate bases of social life to be examined.

Few of us can safely enquire into the things which nature hides, any more than we can dissect our own bodies.

Still, the manner in which Plato arrived at his conclusions should be considered.

For here, as Mr.Grote has remarked, is a wonderful thing, that one of the wisest and best of men should have entertained ideas of morality which are wholly at variance with our own.