It embodies concepts which any theory of natural philosophy must retain and in some sense must explain.

Aristotle asked the fundamental question, What do we mean by 'substance'?
Here the reaction between his philosophy and his logic worked very unfortunately.
In his logic, the fundamental type of affirmative proposition is the attribution of a predicate to a subject.

Accordingly, amid the many current uses of the term 'substance' which he analyses, he emphasises its meaning as 'the ultimate substratum which is no longer predicated of anything else.' The unquestioned acceptance of the Aristotelian logic has led to an ingrained tendency to postulate a substratum for whatever is disclosed in sense-awareness, namely, to look below what we are aware of for the substance in the sense of the 'concrete thing.' This is the origin of the modern scientific concept of matter and of ether, namely they are the outcome of this insistent habit of postulation.
Accordingly ether has been invented by modern science as the substratum of the events which are spread through space and time beyond the reach of ordinary ponderable matter.

Personally, I think that predication is a muddled notion confusing many different relations under a convenient common form of speech.

For example, I hold that the relation of green to a blade of grass is entirely different from the relation of green to the event which is the life history of that blade for some short period, and is different from the relation of the blade to that event.