But he is speaking of courage in the lower sense of the term, not as including loyalty or temperance.

He does not insist in this passage, as in the Protagoras, on the unity of the virtues; or, as in the Laches, on the identity of wisdom and courage.

But he says that they all depend upon their leader mind, and that, out of the union of wisdom and temperance with courage, springs justice.

Elsewhere he is disposed to regard temperance rather as a condition of all virtue than as a particular virtue.

He generalizes temperance, as in the Republic he generalizes justice.