[The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.I., Part A. by David Hume]@TWC D-Link book
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.I., Part A.

CHAPTER XI
111/167

This composition was not at first fixed by law, at least by practice: the king was often exorbitant in his demands, and kept possession of the land till they were complied with.
If the heir were a minor, the king retained the whole profit of the estate till his majority; and might grant what sum he thought proper for the education and maintenance of the young baron.

This practice was also founded on the notion that a fief was a benefice, and that, while the heir could not perform his military services, the revenue devolved to the superior, who employed another in his stead.

It is obvious that a great proportion of the landed property must, by means of this device, be continually in the hands of the prince, and that all the noble familius were thereby held in perpetual dependence.

When the king granted the wardship of a rich heir to any one, he had the opportunity of enriching a favorite or minister: if he sold it, he thereby levied a considerable sum of money.

Simon de Mountfort paid Henry III.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books