LL.
Burgor.cap.

86.] [Footnote 11: NOTE K, p.200.What these laws were of Edward the Confessor, which the English, every reign during a century and a half, desire so passionately to have restored, is much disputed by antiquaries, and our ignorance of them seems one of the greatest defects in the ancient English history.

The collection of laws in Wilkins, which pass under the name of Edward, are plainly a posterior and an ignorant compilation.

Those to be found in Ingulf are genuine; but so imperfect, and contain so few clauses favorable to the subject, that we see no great reason for their contending for them so vehemently.

It is probable that the English meant the common law, as it prevailed during the reign of Edward; which we may conjecture to have been more indulgent to liberty than the Norman institutions.