[The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.II. by Tobias Smollett]@TWC D-Link bookThe History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.II. CHAPTER VIII 20/114
Then they composed another representation in answer to the second address of the commons touching their proceedings.
They charged the lower house with want of zeal in the whole progress of this inquiry.
They produced a great number of precedents to prove that their conduct had been regular and parliamentary; and they, in their turn, accused the commons of partiality and injustice in vacating legal elections.
The queen, in answer to this remonstrance, said, she looked upon any misunderstanding between the two houses as a very great misfortune to the kingdom; and that she should never omit anything in her power to prevent all occasions of them for the future. DISPUTES BETWEEN THE TWO HOUSES. The lords and commons, animated by such opposite principles, seized every opportunity of thwarting each other.
An action having been brought by one Matthew Ashby against William White and the other constables of Aylesbury, for having denied him the privilege of voting in the last election, the cause was tried at the assizes, and the constables were cast with damages.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|