[Albert Gallatin by John Austin Stevens]@TWC D-Link book
Albert Gallatin

CHAPTER VIII
54/78

Uncertain as to whether the act would be disavowed or justified by the American government, Mr.Gallatin explained to the European ministers that the forcible occupation of the Spanish province was an act of self-defence and protection against the Indians, but Richelieu replied that the United States "had adopted the game laws and pursued in foreign ground what was started in its own." Yet, to the astonishment of Mr.Gallatin, Richelieu was moderate and friendly in language, and urged a speedy amicable arrangement of differences with Spain, in whose affairs France took an interest, and who had asked her good offices.

But Gallatin at once rejected any idea that the United States would join France in any mediation between Spain and her revolted colonies.

It seems rather singular that, to the suggestion that a Spanish prince might be sent over to America as an independent monarch, Gallatin contented himself with expressing a doubt as to the efficacy of such a course to preserve their independence.

Mr.
Adams was informed that public recognition of the independence of the insurgent colony of Buenos Ayres would shock the feelings and prejudices of the French ministers, but that notwithstanding this displeasure, France would not join Spain in a war on this account.

England, however, would see such a war without regret, and privateers under Spanish commissions would instantly be fitted out, both in France and England.
Under the existing convention with Great Britain three hundred American vessels arrived at Liverpool in the first nine months of 1818 from the United States and only thirty English, an advantage to the United States which war would at once destroy.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books