First, because so to state it is to misrepresent the entire case.

Next, because some of the articles of indictment are only half true:--in fact are _untrue_.

But chiefly, because in the foregoing enumeration certain considerations are actually suppressed which, had they been fairly stated, would have been found to reverse the issue.

Let me now be permitted to conduct this inquiry in my own way.
The first thing to be done is to enable the reader clearly to understand what the problem before him actually is.

Twelve verses then, which, as a matter of fact, are found dovetailed into a certain context of St.
John's Gospel, the Critics insist must now be dislodged.