It was the Lection for Thursday in the fifth week of the new year; and as the reader sees, it omitted the two last clauses exactly as Codd.

[Symbol: Aleph]ABC do.

Another Ecclesiastical Lection began at verse 51 and extended down to verse 57, and is found to have contained the two last clauses[575].

I wish therefore to inquire:--May it not fairly be presumed that it is the Lectionary practice of the primitive age which has led to the irregularity in this perturbation of the sacred Text?
FOOTNOTES: [495] [Greek: Pros tois dokesei ton Christon pephenenai legontas].
[496] [Greek: To de paidion euxane, kai ekrataiouto pneumati].
[497] It is the twenty-fourth and the thirtieth question in the first Dialogus of pseudo-Caesarius (Gall.vi.17, 20).
[498] Opp.iii.953, 954,--with suspicious emphasis.
[499] Ed.

Migne, vol.93, p.