The single dissentient, Baron Street, was not removed from his place.

He was a man of morals so bad that his own relations shrank from him, and that the Prince of Orange, at the time of the Revolution, was advised not to see him.

The character of Street makes it impossible to believe that he would have been more scrupulous than his brethren.

The character of James makes it impossible to believe that a refractory Baron of the Exchequer would have been permitted to retain his post.

There can be no reasonable doubt that the dissenting Judge was, like the plaintiff and the plaintiff's counsel, acting collusively.