I.hut the English act was soon found to be defective and the defect was supplied by a more stringent act, 5 Eliz.chap.I No such supplementary law was made in Ireland.

That the construction mentioned in the text was put on the Irish Act of Supremacy, we are told by Archbishop King: State of Ireland, chap.

ii.
sec.9.He calls this construction Jesuitical but I cannot see it in that light.] [Footnote 150: Political Anatomy of Ireland.] [Footnote 151: Political Anatomy of Ireland, 1672; Irish Hudibras, 1689; John Dunton's Account of Ireland, 1699.] [Footnote 152: Clarendon to Rochester, May 4.

1686.] [Footnote 153: Bishop Malony's Letter to Bishop Tyrrel, March 5.

1689.] [Footnote 154: Statute 10 & 11 Charles I.chap.