Two Masters in Chancery were sent to announce to the Commons the final resolution of the Peers.
The Commons thought this proceeding unjustifiable in substance and uncourteous in form.

They determined to remonstrate; and Somers drew up an excellent manifesto, in which the vile name of Oates was scarcely mentioned, and in which the Upper House was with great earnestness and gravity exhorted to treat judicial questions judicially, and not, under pretence of administering law, to make law, [403] The wretched man, who had now a second time thrown the political world into confusion, received a pardon, and was set at liberty.

His friends in the Lower House moved an address to the Throne, requesting that a pension sufficient for his support might be granted to him, [404] He was consequently allowed about three hundred a year, a sum which he thought unworthy of his acceptance, and which he took with the savage snarl of disappointed greediness.
From the dispute about Oates sprang another dispute, which might have produced very serious consequences.

The instrument which had declared William and Mary King and Queen was a revolutionary instrument.

It had been drawn up by an assembly unknown to the ordinary law, and had never received the royal sanction.